Your manuscript is your interpretation of the data: the clinical conclusions you drew and the case that the work matters. RigorMD gives it an independent methods-and-statistics read before submission and again after revision — every concern quoted from your own text or recomputed from your own numbers, and written so you can fix it before a reviewer ever sees it.
| 01 | Draft ready | Pre-submission report |
| 02 | Major revision | Revise against the findings |
| 03 | Revised draft | Finding-by-finding re-review |
Use the pre-submission review when your manuscript is drafted and you need an independent second read before upload.
Your review report grades every finding with quotes and recomputed numbers — address those in the revision before you answer the letter.
Use re-review after changes to compare the revised paper against the prior findings and identify what remains unresolved.
It reads like a checklist for your revision, not a judgment of you. Findings are tied to your manuscript text or to a recomputed value from the numbers you reported, and your contribution is positioned against prior work retrieved from the literature — so novelty claims are grounded before an editor tests them. Some questions cannot be answered from a manuscript alone; the report names those limits instead of guessing.