For manuscript authors

Medical manuscript review before and after peer review.

RigorMD gives authors an independent methods-and-statistics second read before submission, during revision, and after re-review. It flags concerns with quoted evidence or recomputed numbers; it does not certify correctness or promise acceptance.

Pre-submission reviewReviewer-response scaffoldRe-review after revisionNo training on your files
Author workflowwhere RigorMD fits
01Draft readyPre-submission report
02Major revisionReviewer-response plan
03Revised draftDelta re-review
Flags and scaffoldsnever certifies
§01 — Author paths
§02 — What authors get

A report you can act on, not a verdict you have to trust.

Findings are tied to your manuscript text or to a recomputed value from the numbers you reported. Some questions cannot be answered from a manuscript alone; the report names those limits instead of guessing.

§03 — Before you upload

Manuscript fit check

See what RigorMD can recompute from your design and reported numbers.

Open →

Every check we run

Review the deterministic checks and what they can and cannot prove.

Open →

Methods

Understand the appraisal domains, two-engine review, and limitations.

Open →
Limits. RigorMD does not guarantee journal acceptance, certify validity, replace peer review, replace clinical judgment, or replace a qualified biostatistician. It flags methodological and statistical concerns for authors to evaluate and address.