Answer the reviewers with a checked revision.

You upload the revised manuscript. The full review runs again — two independent engines, the deterministic statistical checks, the same seven severity-scored domains — and the report adds a finding-by-finding comparison against your first RigorMD report:

• No longer flagged — findings from the first report that do not recur on the revised draft;
• Still flagged — findings that persist, with any change in severity;
• Newly flagged — issues the revision introduced.

The comparison matches findings by domain and content and is a reading aid, not proof that an issue was fixed. One re-review per study.

Paste the decision letter (or the reviewer comments) with your submission — it’s optional, and it works on both the $15 re-review and the $10 review. The report adds a reviewer response section:

• each reviewer point grounded in a verbatim quote from your letter — points that can’t be grounded in the pasted text are listed as dropped, never invented;
• every point classified must-fix vs presentational ask — the distinction that decides a resubmission — with an adversarial second read on every must-fix call before it ships;
• a draft response per point and an overall response scaffold, written to be edited — language that promises acceptance is redacted, flagged, and shown to you.

The response letter stays yours to send: drafts are scaffolds to edit against your manuscript and the editor’s instructions, not language to submit unread.

• $15 when this manuscript was reviewed with RigorMD — the full review again, plus the finding-by-finding comparison against your first report;
• $10 for a manuscript we haven’t seen — the standard pre-submission review, under the same no-identifiers attestation and confidentiality posture.

Your report is private to you and the recipients you name — never visible to an institution admin. See the full lifecycle and pricing, every check we run, or the free reference-integrity checker.