A manuscript is an author interpreting their data, drawing the clinical conclusions, and making the case that the work matters — that is where your reviewers’ attention belongs. RigorMD Editorial Evaluation screens each submission first: a dedicated Anthropic appraiser reads the manuscript against the criteria your journal supplies, and numeric checks recompute the statistics that can be checked. Every concern comes back with the manuscript quote behind it, so your desk editors see the serious problems, and the evidence, before reviewer time is spent.
Editorial offices use the report to decide where human attention adds the most value, before reviewer and statistical-editor time is spent.
Your editorial office sends the manuscript, plus the instructions or criteria you want it read against.
RigorMD flags methods, statistics, and reporting risks — and notes where the conclusions outrun the data.
The report frames author queries and reviewer focus points. Decisions stay with your editors.
Four things are settled before any pilot report is produced or delivered.
| Only manuscripts your journal has already decided, de-identified, or otherwise authorized |
| Confidentiality terms agreed before we read anything |
| No model training on your manuscripts |
| Reports are for internal editorial-office use only |